Conventional Family - Non Conventional Family -       What's the Difference?

The diptych "Conventional Family - Non-Conventional Family - What's the Difference?" is executed in acrylic on canvas, each measuring 20 x 30 cm. The use of acrylic paint allows for bold and vivid colors, which are skillfully layered to create a sense of depth and dimensionality. The shapes are precise and geometric, lending a structural integrity to the compositions. The contrasting colors and clean lines highlight the differences and similarities between the two pieces, encouraging the viewer to engage in a comparative analysis.

In the first painting, the warm background and the arrangement of shapes suggest a conventional family structure. The use of primary colors in a harmonious layout evokes stability and tradition. In contrast, the second painting employs a more dynamic arrangement of shapes and colors, suggesting movement and change. The slightly more chaotic composition and the use of overlapping shapes imply a non-conventional family structure, one that is flexible and evolving.

Social-Political Aspect and Reflection

These paintings delve into the concept of family structures, challenging the viewer to question preconceived notions of what constitutes a family. The titles, "Conventional Family" and "Non-Conventional Family," paired with the subtitle "What's the Difference?" prompt an immediate reflection on societal norms and the evolving definitions of family.

The conventional family is often depicted in societal narratives as a nuclear unit—mother, father, and children—symbolized here by the balanced and symmetrical composition. This painting represents societal expectations and the traditional roles within a family. The warm tones and organized layout reinforce the idea of a stable and accepted family unit.

On the other hand, the non-conventional family painting challenges this notion by presenting a less structured and more fluid arrangement. The use of intersecting shapes and varied colors symbolizes the diversity and inclusivity of modern family units, which may include single parents, same-sex couples, blended families, and other forms. The dynamic composition reflects the complexity and adaptability required in these family structures.

By juxtaposing these two images, the artist encourages a dialogue about the validity and recognition of all family types. The diptych serves as a visual commentary on the evolving landscape of family dynamics, pushing against the boundaries of traditional definitions and highlighting the importance of acceptance and understanding in contemporary society.

These two paintings are a poignant exploration of family structures through abstract forms and vibrant colors. The technical execution is precise and deliberate, while the social-political commentary is both thought-provoking and timely, urging viewers to reconsider and embrace the diverse manifestations of family in the modern world.


Acrylic on canvas, 20 x 30 cm, employs a warm color palette and geometric abstraction to depict a traditional family structure. The composition is balanced and symmetrical, with carefully arranged shapes and colors that evoke stability and harmony. The use of primary colors—red, green, and blue—against a muted background suggests a sense of order and predictability, characteristic of conventional family ideals.

The central figures are stylized and abstract, yet their close proximity and cohesive arrangement symbolize the unity and interconnectedness typically associated with a traditional family. The clean lines and precise shapes reflect the societal expectations and roles within such a family unit, reinforcing notions of stability and uniformity.


Acrylic on canvas, 20 x 30 cm, utilizes a vibrant and dynamic color palette to depict a non-traditional family structure. The composition is more fluid and asymmetrical compared to its counterpart, "Conventional Family." The overlapping and intersecting shapes create a sense of movement and complexity, symbolizing the evolving and diverse nature of modern family units.

The use of varied colors—red, green, blue, and white—against a bold red background enhances the visual impact, suggesting a departure from conventional norms. The arrangement of shapes is less predictable and more exploratory, reflecting the flexibility and adaptability of non-conventional families. The abstract forms maintain a cohesive relationship, yet their positioning indicates individuality and variety within the family unit.